For related articles and more information, please visit OCA’s Politics and Democracy page.

Factual Evidence Contradicts the 9/11 Story

 The official account of the events of September 11, 2001, has been used:

 to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq; which have resulted in the deaths of millions of people;  to authorize torture, military tribunals, and extraordinary rendition; and  to suspend freedoms guaranteed by the American Constitution such as habeas corpus in the USA, and similar freedoms in Canada, the UK, and other countries.

The official claims regarding 9/11 are contradicted by facts that have been validated by a scientific consensus process, and which include the following points of “best evidence”:

 Point 1: A Claim Regarding Osama Bin Laden

 The Official Account

Osama bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 attacks.

The Best Evidence

The FBI did not list 9/11 as one of the terrorist acts for which Osama bin Laden is wanted. When asked why, Rex Tomb, when he was the head of investigative publicity for the FBI, stated that the FBI had no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11. Also, although Secretary of State Colin Powell, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, and the 9/11 Commission promised to provide evidence of Bin Laden’s responsibility for the 9/11 attacks, they also failed.