Fauci Admits COVID’s Origin May Be Lab as WEF Preps for “Disease X”

Now that Anthony Fauci isn’t running the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases anymore, and is no longer doling out grants for “gain-of-function” bioweapons research, he’s no longer dismissing the idea that SARS-CoV-2 came from a lab.

Meanwhile, corporate and government leaders meeting in Davos at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum this month are “Preparing for Disease X.”

Fauci Admits COVID May Have Originated in a Lab 

On January 10, the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) reported from the subcommittee’s two-day closed-door transcribed interview with Dr. Fauci that:

• Dr. Fauci acknowledged that the lab leak hypothesis is not a conspiracy theory. This comes nearly four years after prompting the publication of the now infamous “Proximal Origin” paper that attempted to vilify and disprove the lab leak hypothesis; and

• Dr. Fauci played semantics with the definition of a “lab-leak” in an attempt to cover-up the inaccurate conclusions of “Proximal Origin.” It is impossible for Dr. Fauci to defend the conclusion of this publication while simultaneously acknowledging that a lab-leak is possible.

COVID doesn’t have a natural origin. SARS-CoV-2 wasn’t found in the farms that stocked the Wuhan wet market, and it has never been found in the wild anywhere in the world. 

Virus hunters like Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance are still out there claiming to be looking for the natural origin of SARS. On January 9, 2024, Daszak presented at a World Health Organization event. (Here are his slides and a video of the session.) He claimed to have found, in Thailand, a new bat virus very closely related to SARS-CoV-2. Naturally, he took it back to the lab to study how well it infected human cells. What could go wrong?! He didn’t say whether he shared it with Ralph Baric, the scientist infamous for his “no-see’em” “gain-of-function” genetic engineering techniques for weaponizing pathogens.

Gain-of-function research continues around the world. In China, scientists published a study on January 4, 2024, where they infected humanized mice with a mutant pangolin coronavirus that infected the brain. Every single mouse died. (Here’s a video from Dr. John Campbell on the risks of this kind of “gain-of-function” bioweapons research.

The World Economic Forum is Preparing for Disease X

“With fresh warnings from the World Health Organization that an unknown ‘Disease X’ could result in 20 times more fatalities than the coronavirus pandemic, what novel efforts are needed to prepare healthcare systems for the multiple challenges ahead?”

That’s the description of a January 17 session at the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos entitled “Preparing for Disease X” sponsored by the WEF’s Collaborative Surveillance Initiative.

When the WEF says it’s preparing for “Disease X,” we should pay close attention, remembering that, in October 2019, the World Economic Forum was one of the hosts of the eerily predictive Event 201 where they laid out exactly how governments would respond to–and corporations would profit from–the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2022, the same team that brought us Event 201 staged Catastrophic Contagion, a planning exercise for a fictional virus that emerges in 2025. A monkeypox outbreak scenario was rehearsed in 2021 and then monkeypox emerged on the exact day used in the fictional exercise, May 15, 2022.

The speakers for the WEF’s January 17 “Disease X” program are some of the very same people who planned and profited from the last pandemic. Specifically, they’re the gang that found a new home in Brazil and India for the AstraZeneca vaccine rejected by the U.S. and E.U. for causing blood clots. They have a few new tricks up their sleeves to overcome the global resistance to forced vaccination, including technologies that track compliance from birth using biometric data and new capacities to deliver vaccinations remotely using drones and telemedicine.

Michel Demaré is the board chair of AstraZeneca, the pharmaceutical giant that made a COVID-19 vaccine that was widely known to cause blood clots and was therefore rejected by most countries.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO). In March 2021, when wealthy nations started noticing blood clots from the AstraZeneca vaccine and suspending its use, he gave it the WHO’s stamp of approval and started organizing the disposal–he used the word “donation”–of the unused vaccines in poorer countries, the biggest opportunities for this being India and Brazil. 

“Why was AstraZeneca’s Covishield administered in India when it was suspended in the UK and some European countries due to severe side-effects?” complained cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra in 2023. “There needs to be immediate suspension pending inquiry as to why India got this so very very wrong.” 

Preetha Reddy is Executive Vice-Chairperson of Apollo Hospitals, India’s largest hospital chain. During COVID, she spoke out against “vaccine hesitancy” and her private, for-profit hospital system was the largest vaccine distributor in India–essential to the AstraZeneca-WHO plan to unload unwanted shots. 

Nisia Trindade Lima is Brazil’s Minister of Health. Brazil is where the U.S. dumped its excess AstraZeneca vaccines after the blood clot problem was discovered. Lima made that possible. During the pandemic, she was President of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), which was responsible for the production of the AstraZeneca vaccine in Brazil. 

Besides pushing the dangerous AstraZeneca vaccine on India and Brazil, the other thing the “Preparing for Disease X” speakers have in common is that they want to move medicine online. Why stop with vaccine passports, when all medical records could be in the cloud, accessible via biometric digital identity systems that scan our fingerprints or irises? Why stop with online doctors’ visits when, through implantable devices, drones and artificial intelligence, many other medical services could be delivered via telehealth?

Shyam Bishen heads the World Economic Forum’s Centre for Health and Healthcare. Prior to joining the WEF, he worked for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Merck. His mission is to digitize medicine and take health care into the metaverse. In his 2023 article, “Here’s how AI and digital health are shaping the future of healthcare,” Bishen lists “big data models, telemedicine, predictive medication, wearable sensors and a wealth of new platforms and apps” as tools for this project, as well as artificial intelligence, “AI automation and augmentation” and “generative AI platforms like ChatGPT and Med-PaLM,” and “remote tools and sensors – backed by big data.” Apollo Hospitals, represented in the “Preparing for Disease X” session by Preetha Reddy, is a pioneer in telehealth and artificial intelligence decision making tools. 

Roy Jakobs is President and Chief Executive Officer of Royal Philips, the health data company that’s partnering with the GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance on a Amazon Web Services cloud-based, artificial-intelligence, internet-of-things system “to confidently identify and effectively immunize children, no matter where they live.” Philips manufactures implantable medical devices that allow for remote monitoring and electronic medical records integration. GAVI, backed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, implements biometric digital identity systems to track vaccine status.

As the World Economic Forum “Prepares for Disease X” with their digital vaccine surveillance and compliance tools, we need to organize to stop the next pandemic. In addition to keeping health care decisions off digital apps and in our hands, we have to address the true cause of the COVID-19 pandemic: “gain-of-function” bioweapons research.

Stop the Next Pandemic Before It Starts! Ban “Gain-of-Function” Bioweapons Research!

Related Posts