| SUBSCRIBE | DONATE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Researchers Warn that Some COVID-19 Vaccines Could Increase RISK of HIV Infection
Asymptomatic ‘Casedemic’ Is a Perpetuation of Needless Fear
Gates Ag One: The Recolonisation of Agriculture
Lawsuit: Tyson Managers Bet Money on How Many Workers Would Contract COVID-19
‘The Real Looting in America Is the Walton Family’: GAO Report Details How Taxpayers Subsidize Cruel Low Wages of Corporate Giants
How do we create abundance?
Science and Big Business say we should only look forward―to more complex technology and innovation. But centuries ago, Native Americans already knew one of the secrets.
Long before Europeans reached North America and the first settlers sat down to the first Thanksgiving meal, many Native Americans cultivated staples corn, squash and beans together in one plot. They called these plants “sisters” to reflect how they thrived when they were grown together.
Interplanting these agricultural sisters produced bountiful harvests that sustained large Native communities and created fruitful trade economies.
If the European settlers learned anything from this example, the lesson didn’t stick with them for very long. Today we rely on monoculture farming that damages our land, our climate and, ultimately, our bodies.
As we sit down to our Thanksgiving meals this year it’s worth asking ourselves: why did these superior Native farming practices decline and what benefits could emerge from bringing them back?
The idea that the world might soon be unable to feed its human population is an old and powerful narrative that has recently been extensively exploited by agribusiness.
But it’s an idea that actually rests on some pretty shaky foundations, mostly based on flawed mathematical models that support a business-as-usual model of farming and food production.
According to a new analysis by Dr. Jonathan Latham these models either underestimate global food supply (now and in the future), or they cause the models to overestimate global food demand (now and in the future).
Dr. Latham argues that rather than a food shortage we have a global glut. As such there is no real justification for extreme measures to improve yields, or to turn to GMOs or pesticides in order to feed the global population.
If we want to feed the world well, agricultural practices and policies should be driven by criteria such as ecological sustainability and cultural appropriateness―not trumped-up concerns about yield.
“Like a pandemic, climate change is an inevitable threat that we must address before it is too late…we need to support a recovery for farmers that puts the fight against climate change and biodiversity loss at its core.”
These are not the rousing words of Greta Thunberg, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or Al Gore, but a message from global Ag-Tech giant Syngenta.
This kind of messaging can also be found in similar “green” campaigns from the other “big five” global pesticides producers Bayer, BASF, Corteva and FMC.
It’s not so much a road to Damascus moment for Big Ag as it is a cynical co-option of the language of transformation.
Companies that produce pesticides and GM crops, that patent seeds, that encourage large monocultures and markets that drive small farmers out of business are increasingly using greenwash words to sell their wares.
But make no mistake. Nothing will ever make these companies, whose products have directly led to biodiversity loss and accelerating climate change, meaningful participants in a better, cleaner, safer world.
It’s time to call these green fakers out.
We need our leaders to lead.
As President-elect Biden considers his new cabinet we must encourage him to choose those who understand the multiple and intersecting crises we face, especially around climate change.
The Sunrise Movement and Justice Democrats have proposed a slate of potential cabinet picks that includes the top advocates for regenerative organic food and farming, including organic farmer and Maine Congresswoman Chellie Pingree for Agriculture Secretary.
But fears are already mounting that Biden will feel pressured to avoid confrontation―and a potential veto―and choose those whom Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell approves of.
Biden has options: there are alternative political and legal strategies open to him that will allow him to fill out the executive branch without allowing McConnell to become a de facto co-president.
Let’s put some alternative pressure on and ensure he appoints a cabinet of people who 1) don’t have ties to agribusiness, fossil fuel companies or corporate lobbyists; 2) represent the diversity of America; and 3) are ready to act with the urgency that the climate, economic, health and farm crises demand.
It’s tough enough when independent farmers who raise organic regenerative poultry have to compete in a marketplace dominated by corporate-owned factory farm “Big Brands.”
It’s even tougher when those Big Brands make false claims about their products.
This week, OCA joined five other nonprofits in filing a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) complaint against Cargill for falsely implying that its Honeysuckle White and Shady Brook Farms turkey products are produced by “independent family farmers.” Because, well, they aren’t.
Not only that, but Cargill makes a host of other false claims about its Honeysuckle and Shady Brook brands, all intended to imply that the brands have far-reaching benefits for workers, animals and the environment.
In fact, far from the bucolic family farms portrayed by Cargill’s marketing, Cargill’s actual production methods exploit contract farmers and slaughterhouse workers, systematically abuse animals and cause grave harms to the environment.
Read ‘This Major Company Is Under Fire for Allegedly Mislabeling Turkeys’
Read ‘MN-based Cargill Faces Federal Complaint Over Turkey Labels’
The metaphors of war have long been a part of public health.
We fight illness. Sometimes we beat disease and sometimes we lose the battle. We shore up and mobilize our immune defences.
For most of this year we have been in lock-down to protect ourselves from an invisible enemy and now we are looking for a magic-bullet, in the form of a vaccine, to save us.
The way we talk about health influences the choices that we make, both as individuals and in terms of public healthcare.
As long as we are at war with nature, and at war with our bodies we will frame our healthcare choices in terms of a war.
That choice means we never have to delve too deeply into the origins of illness. We don’t have to acknowledge the complexity of the socioeconomic factors that influence who is most vulnerable―and we can easily be controlled by the politics of fear.
As this week’s two-part essay reveals, it’s long past time for the public health dialogue to move beyond its out-dated words of war.
Let’s measure health in its broader context, according to the quality of our lives, the quality of our food and our environment and not according to narrow metrics of vaccine uptake.
Less than a week after the launch of the national coalition of U.S. Farmers & Ranchers for a Green New Deal, Beth Hoffman, a coalition member, sent us a video, with a little straight talk straight from a farmer.
Hoffman’s message?
“I think America has to make some decisions about farmers and farming, and making them viable . . . How we’re going to support people on the land is a critical question right now.”
Hoffman and her partner, John Hogeland, are taking over her family’s Iowa farm, Whippoorwill Creek Farm.
As Hoffman has written before, it’s not easy for beginning farmers, especially those who want to transition to organic regenerative practices, to make a living:
But farming – even in a place like Iowa – is a profession that doesn’t pay. Not “doesn’t pay” like teachers should be paid more or cooks make so much less than waiters. No, farming at small scale like we are talking about doing on the farm literally does not make any money. In fact, farmers often pay to farm.
A Green New Deal, with transformational ag policy reforms, could change things for farmers like Hoffman.
Watch ‘A Young Farmer’s Plea for a Green New Deal’
SIGN UP for the Regeneration International newsletter
TAKE ACTION: Support the national coalition of U.S. Farmers and Ranchers for a Green New Deal!